ABOUT
How
How can this be possible?
How can success be achieved when all others have failed to accomplish what you promise? How can a safe-haven zone, a Light City, a Bastion of Freedom, a beyul,l be created and protected when the “Others” have all the hammers with which to destroy?” Can the hypothecation of an area of a planet, by its tenants, possibly end in anything other than tears?”
We are selling hope – and where there is Hope there is always a way – this way leads you Home and away from Division
AUTHORITY TO CREATE AREA 52 – HOW WAS IT POSSIBLE?
The Declarative Theory of Statehood
1.NATURAL GOD GIVEN LAW
Natural Law, Conventional and Modal Law + The Right to Self- Determinacy by Minority Groups, the Claim of Right on Behalf of all Human Kind to Self-Determinacy and Freedom from Oppression, Slavery and Coercion, Taxation, Usury and Barratry
2. The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, 1933
The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States is a treaty signed at Montevideo, Uruguay, on December 26, 1933, during the Seventh International Conference of American States. The Convention codifies the declarative theory of statehood as accepted as part of customary international law. At the conference, United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Secretary of State Cordell Hull declared the Good Neighbour Policy, which opposed U.S. armed intervention in inter-American affairs. The convention was signed by 19 states. The acceptance of three of the signatories was subject to minor reservations. Those states were Brazil, Peru and the United States.
The convention became operative on December 26, 1934. It was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on January 8, 1936, which later became the United Nations (UN).
Just do it!
In most cases, the only avenue open to self-determination for colonial or national ethnic minority populations was to achieve international legal personality as a nation-state. The majority of delegations at the International Conference of American States represented independent states that had emerged from former colonies. In most cases, their own existence and independence had been disputed or opposed by one or more of the European colonial empires. They agreed among themselves to criteria that made it easier for other dependent states with limited sovereignty to gain international recognition
The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:
- A permanent population
- A defined territory
- Government
- Capacity to enter into relations with the other states
The convention sets out the definition, rights and duties of statehood. Most well-known is Article 1, which sets out the four criteria for statehood that have been recognized by international organizations as an accurate statement of customary international law:
- A permanent population
- A defined territory
- Government
- Capacity to enter into relations with the other states
The convention sets out the definition, rights and duties of statehood. Most well-known is Article 1, which sets out the four criteria for statehood that have been recognized by international organizations as an accurate statement of customary international law:
TWO QUESTIONS – YES IS THE ANSWER
Question 1
DOES A FORESIGHTED MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL COMMONS COMMUNITY (sic) Peter of England, HAVE POWER & AUTONOMY TO DECLARE AN AUTONOMOUS, SELF-REGULATING, INDEPENDENT NATION STATE COLLECTIVE CONTAINED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL REGION KNOWN AS THE GLOBAL COMMONS?
Answer: Yes
Question 2
Does Area 52 have an autonomous right to exist?
Answer: Yes
The fact that he has already done it – following Divine Mandate is your answer. As it is already in existence then the question is moot. The area is a certain designation – it was like a body without a soul. Inert, inanimate and ghost like, however as it has now been ensouled by “The SonShip”, then it has taken on its destiny, origin and purpose as a Waiting Room, a Sanctuary for those who choose a better world In which to dwell in preparation for things to come.
“an area common to all mankind – owned by all – controlled by none.”
Does Area 52 have an autonomous right to exist?
The answer is “Yes!”… if the following criteria are met, then no argument can ensue
Furthermore, the first sentence of Article 3 explicitly states that:
of the Montevideo Convention 1933
"The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states"
This is known as the declarative theory of statehood. It stands in conflict with the alternative constitutive theory of statehood, by which a state exists only insofar as it is recognized by other states. It should not be confused with the Estrada doctrine. "Independence" and "sovereignty" are not mentioned in Article 1.
CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW
As a restatement of customary international law, The Montevideo Convention merely codified existing legal norms and its principles and therefore does not apply merely to the signatories, but to all subjects of international law as a whole
The European Union, in the principal statement of its Badinter Committee, follows the Montevideo Convention in its definition of a state: by having a territory, a population, and a political authority.
The committee also found that the existence of states was a question of fact, while the recognition by other states was purely declaratory and not a determinative factor of statehood.
SWITZERLAND
Switzerland, although not a member of the European Union, adheres to the same principle, stating that "neither a political unit needs to be recognized to become a state, nor does a state have the "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states." 16 obligation to recognize another one. At the same time, neither recognition is enough to create a state, nor does its absence abolish it."
SOVEREIGNTY
Sovereignty can generally be defined as supreme authority. Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change existing laws. In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme legitimate authority over some polity*. In international law, sovereignty is the exercise of power by a state. De jure sovereignty refers to the legal right to do so; de facto sovereignty refers to the factual ability to do so. This can become an issue of special concern upon the failure of the usual expectation that de jure and de facto sovereignty exist at the place and time of concern and reside within the same organization
* NB POLITY: A polity is an identifiable political entity – a group of people with a collective identity, who are organized by some form of institutionalized social relations and have a capacity to mobilize resources. A polity can be any other group of people organized for governance (such as a corporate board), the government of a country, or of a country subdivision. A polity may be a republic administered by an elected representative, or the realm of a hereditary monarch.
